ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Evaluating the feasibility and safety of 48-h short-stay pathway for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare perioperative outcomes between the 48-h short-stay pathway and traditional inpatient management for patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and to evaluate the feasibility, safety, recovery efficiency, and economic benefits of the 48-h short-stay pathway.
methodsThis retrospective study included 175 patients who underwent RAPN between February 2022 and June 2024. Patients were assigned to a 48-h short-stay group (n = 60) or a traditional inpatient group (n = 115). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, tumor features, surgeon identity, and surgical year. Perioperative outcomes, recovery indicators, complications, and medical costs were compared.
resultsAfter PSM, 53 matched pairs were analyzed. The short-stay group showed significantly shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter warm ischemia time, earlier mobilization, earlier oral intake, faster bowel function recovery, and shorter bed rest (all P < 0.05). The short-stay group had 71.7% of patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 100% within 48 h, while the traditional group had 22.6% on POD1, 33.96% on POD2, and 43.4% on POD ≥ 3 (P < 0.001). Both total and postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the short-stay group (2.00 vs. 6.00 days, P < 0.001), with lower hospitalization costs (P < 0.001). Postoperative creatinine was lower in the short-stay group (P = 0.023), while creatinine change was comparable (P = 0.063). Complication rates, emergency department visits, and 30-day readmission rates were similar between groups (all P > 0.05). The short-stay group had a significantly lower drain placement rate (P = 0.002) without increased adverse events.
conclusionThe 48-h short-stay pathway for selected patients undergoing RAPN is feasible and safe. It accelerates postoperative recovery, shortens hospital stay, reduces medical costs, and optimizes healthcare resource utilization, without compromising safety or oncological early outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.