ArticleScientific reports2026
Prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice: a large cohort study in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population-based organized prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is implemented in 80% of Japanese municipalities; however, Shiga Prefecture remains a unique exception without such a systematic program. This study characterized the longitudinal clinical features and treatment patterns in this opportunistic testing environment using data from 1716 patients diagnosed via prostate biopsy in 2012, 2017, and 2022. While median PSA levels remained stable (10.40-11.43 ng/mL), median age at diagnosis increased from 72 to 74 years. Over the decade, the incidence of International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 and cT1c stages decreased significantly (p < 0.001), with nearly 90% of cases being cT2 or higher in 2022. Risk classification showed a decrease in low-risk cases and a rise in high-risk cases. Regarding treatment, radical prostatectomy rates remained stable at approximately 25%, whereas the overall use of active surveillance (AS) increased from 1 to 9%. Notably, among low-risk patients, AS adoption rose markedly from 2.3% in 2012 to 68% in 2022. While clinical practices have evolved to successfully minimize unnecessary invasive intervention, these findings suggest that clinical progress alone cannot fully compensate for the lack of organized efforts to improve early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.