Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice: a large cohort study in Japan.

Akinori Wada, Yuki Okinaka, Masayuki Nagasawa, Toru Yoshida, Satoshi Ishitoya, Takashi Osafune, Chul Jang Kim, So Ushijima, Ryosuke Murai, Mitsuhiro Narita and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Akinori WadaDepartment of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan. akiraten@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-9519
Yuki OkinakaDepartment of Urology, Yasu City Hospital, Yasu, Shiga, Japan.
Masayuki NagasawaDepartment of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Toru YoshidaShiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Shiga, Japan.
Satoshi IshitoyaJapanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Takashi OsafuneOtsu City Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Chul Jang KimKohka Public Hospital, Koka, Shiga, Japan.
So UshijimaOmihachiman Community Medical Center, Omihachiman, Shiga, Japan.
Ryosuke MuraiNagahama City Hospital, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NaritaOmi Medical Center, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Zenkai NishikawaHino Memorial Hospital, Hino, Shiga, Japan.
Hiroki SogaToyosato Hospital, Toyosato, Shiga, Japan.
Hiroshi UshidaJCHO Shiga Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Yuji SakanoNational Hospital Organization Higashi-ohmi General Medical Center, Higashiomi, Shiga, Japan.
Yoshio NayaNagahama City Kohoku Hospital, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan.
Yoshimasa HaradaNagahama Red Cross Hospital, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan.
Taichi SanoHikone Municipal Hospital, Hikone, Shiga, Japan.
Teruhiko TsuruOtsu City Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kenichi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Kazuaki YamanakaDepartment of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Tetsuya YoshidaDepartment of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Susumu KageyamaDepartment of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-based organized prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is implemented in 80% of Japanese municipalities; however, Shiga Prefecture remains a unique exception without such a systematic program. This study characterized the longitudinal clinical features and treatment patterns in this opportunistic testing environment using data from 1716 patients diagnosed via prostate biopsy in 2012, 2017, and 2022. While median PSA levels remained stable (10.40-11.43 ng/mL), median age at diagnosis increased from 72 to 74 years. Over the decade, the incidence of International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 and cT1c stages decreased significantly (p < 0.001), with nearly 90% of cases being cT2 or higher in 2022. Risk classification showed a decrease in low-risk cases and a rise in high-risk cases. Regarding treatment, radical prostatectomy rates remained stable at approximately 25%, whereas the overall use of active surveillance (AS) increased from 1 to 9%. Notably, among low-risk patients, AS adoption rose markedly from 2.3% in 2012 to 68% in 2022. While clinical practices have evolved to successfully minimize unnecessary invasive intervention, these findings suggest that clinical progress alone cannot fully compensate for the lack of organized efforts to improve early detection.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyCohort StudiesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenPrimary therapyProstate cancerPSA screeningReal world dataRisk classification

Identifiers

PMID42069962
PMCPMC13328616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.