ArticleScientific reports2026
Community knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding common zoonotic diseases in Arbaminch District, Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zoonotic diseases are common threats to global health. A large number of infectious diseases are transmitted from animals to humans. The current study aimed to assess the community's knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding common zoonotic diseases in the Arbaminch district. A cross-sectional survey was carried out between November 2024 and June 2025. A total of 384 participants were interviewed in the study. Participants residing in these areas were randomly chosen. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using Stata 17, and the results were reported using descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. The findings of this study revealed that a majority (55%) of participants had good knowledge about zoonotic diseases. Respondents know several modes of transmission for zoonotic diseases, with animal bites (32.5%) being the most recognized, followed by direct contact (15.5%), ingestion of raw products (10%), and inhalation (10%). Regarding attitudes, 63.2% of respondents exhibited a positive attitude towards the importance of zoonotic disease prevention and control, and 67.4% of respondents followed relatively good hygiene and preventive behaviors. However, risky practices were still common. Knowledge score showed a significant association with age. Attitudes of participants were significantly associated with education, age, occupation, and income. Similarly, practices were significantly associated with gender, education level, occupation, and income, with all associations being statistically significant (p < 0.05). The overall community knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding zoonotic diseases were relatively good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.