Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069927›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An improved particle swarm optimization framework with Jacobian guidance for inverse kinematics of non-Pieper robots.

Saidong Yang, Ruilong Ren, Debo Liu, Lu Mi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saidong YangFaculty of Engineering, Huanghe Science and Technology University, Zhengzhou, China. sidon_yang@126.com.
Ruilong RenFAIR Innovation Robotic System Co.,Ltd, Suzhou, China.
Debo LiuFaculty of Engineering, Huanghe Science and Technology University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lu MiDuoyuan Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

Henan Province Key R&D Special Project 251111220100Henan Province Key Scientific and Technological Project 252102220121Key Scientific Research Project of Henan Higher Education Institutions 25B460022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For non-Pieper robotic manipulators that lack closed-form analytical solutions, inverse kinematics (IK) is typically solved using numerical or optimization-based methods. However, conventional Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms often suffer from premature convergence, unstable performance near singular configurations, and limited trajectory smoothness. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an improved PSO framework that integrates a nonlinear inertia weight strategy with Jacobian pseudo-inverse guidance. The nonlinear inertia weight employs a two-phase adaptation mechanism, enhancing global exploration in the early iterations and improving local exploitation later, thus avoiding stagnation. The Jacobian guidance introduces gradient-based directional information, which accelerates convergence and improves robustness under singular conditions. Furthermore, a quaternion-based pose error formulation combined with a joint continuity penalty ensures smooth trajectory tracking and avoids orientation singularities. Experimental results on benchmark functions and two representative non-Pieper manipulators demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior convergence accuracy, improved stability, and better trajectory continuity compared with multiple PSO variants. The results confirm the effectiveness and generality of the proposed framework for solving IK problems of non-Pieper robots.

Indexed as

Inverse kinematicsJacobian guidanceNon-Pieper RobotsParticle Swarm OptimizationTrajectory smoothness

Identifiers

PMID42069927
PMCPMC13324632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.