ArticleScientific reports2026
Learning fuzzy representations for hypergraph node classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an extension of standard graphs, hypergraphs have demonstrated significant advantages in modeling high-order complex relationships compared with standard graphs. Existing literature has witnessed the great success of hypergraph representation learning methods in classifying nodes. However, most of them seek to obtain low-dimensional crisp representations, overlooking the fuzzy and uncertain nature of node attributes. In fact, node attributes such as paper keywords may contain noise or be incomplete, which leads to uncertain semantics. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose learning fuzzy representations for hypergraph node classification. Specifically, we develop a novel method called Hypergraph Collaborative Fuzzy Network (HyperCFN), which studies hypergraph representations with fuzzy logic. Firstly, HyperCFN augments the original hypergraph into two hypergraphs, which are then put into the proposed fuzzy hypergraph encoders. The fuzzy hypergraph encoders consist of hypergraph collaborative networks and fuzzy logic to learn fuzzy representations for every node and hyperedge. Subsequently, the learned representations are enforced node-, hyperedge-, and membership-level contrast. Lastly, to further preserve the hypergraph structure, we develop decoders to reconstruct the augmented hypergraphs. We perform extensive experiments on several datasets, and the promising results demonstrate that the effectiveness of the proposed model and learning fuzzy representations for hypergraphs is valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.