Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069925›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Learning fuzzy representations for hypergraph node classification.

Zhishu Sun, Ruijing Geng, Ge Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhishu SunDepartment of Computer and Information Security Management, Fujian Police College, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian, China.
Ruijing GengCollege of Aerospace Information, Space Engineering University, Beijing, Beijing, 101416, China.
Ge ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China. umbrellazg@stu.jnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Innovation of Policing Science and Technology of Fujian Province 2024YZ040001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an extension of standard graphs, hypergraphs have demonstrated significant advantages in modeling high-order complex relationships compared with standard graphs. Existing literature has witnessed the great success of hypergraph representation learning methods in classifying nodes. However, most of them seek to obtain low-dimensional crisp representations, overlooking the fuzzy and uncertain nature of node attributes. In fact, node attributes such as paper keywords may contain noise or be incomplete, which leads to uncertain semantics. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose learning fuzzy representations for hypergraph node classification. Specifically, we develop a novel method called Hypergraph Collaborative Fuzzy Network (HyperCFN), which studies hypergraph representations with fuzzy logic. Firstly, HyperCFN augments the original hypergraph into two hypergraphs, which are then put into the proposed fuzzy hypergraph encoders. The fuzzy hypergraph encoders consist of hypergraph collaborative networks and fuzzy logic to learn fuzzy representations for every node and hyperedge. Subsequently, the learned representations are enforced node-, hyperedge-, and membership-level contrast. Lastly, to further preserve the hypergraph structure, we develop decoders to reconstruct the augmented hypergraphs. We perform extensive experiments on several datasets, and the promising results demonstrate that the effectiveness of the proposed model and learning fuzzy representations for hypergraphs is valid.

Indexed as

Contrastive learningFuzzy logicFuzzy representationHypergraphsNode classification

Identifiers

PMID42069925
PMCPMC13323706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.