ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Uncovering monitoring gaps and novel persistent and mobile substances (PMs) in groundwater using lyophilisation enrichment and SFC-HRMS smart screening.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Legacy PFAS: Dominant Role of Ultrashort-Chain and Emerging PFAS in the Elbe River-Sea Continuum.ACS environmental Au · 2026Article
- Persistent and Mobile Chemicals, Including Ultrashort-Chain PFAS, in Groundwater: Distribution, Relevant Factors, and Risk.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Persistent and mobile chemicals (PMs) threaten groundwater quality and drinking water safety, yet many remain undetected because analytical methods insufficiently address highly polar and ionic substances, while regulatory frameworks lack monitoring requirements for these compound classes. Here, we developed a supercritical fluid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry-based smart-screen approach that integrates three key prioritisation strategies: (i) sampling site prioritisation, (ii) suspect-level prioritisation through tiered suspect lists, and (iii) candidate prioritisation using stepwise scoring. Additionally, the method achieved the sensitive identification and reliable quantification of PMs in groundwater, with a median limit of quantification of 6.8 ng/L, stable recoveries (75%), and low matrix effects (-12%) across diverse groundwater types. Prioritisation reduced 599 groundwater wells to 10 representative sites, yielding an 8.6-fold reduction in analytical workload while maintaining chemical diversity. The tiered suspect lists and stepwise scoring strategies improved confirmation efficiency and facilitated the detection of substances of high environmental relevance. Collectively, 34 PMs were detected across six substance groups including polar per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, polyfluorinated inorganic species, transformation products, and amide or ether solvents at concentrations of 0.1-22,300 ng/L. Among these, 16 substances were newly detected in ambient groundwater and four were reported for the first time in any environmental compartment. Several substances (e.g. 2-phenylpropane-2-sulphonic acid) are not classified as persistent under EU regulation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) yet occur ubiquitously in groundwater, suggesting an underestimation of PMs under aquifer conditions. These findings advance monitoring of PMs, supporting their regulation for groundwater and drinking water protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.