ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid Machine learning-based modeling to predict and optimize the compressive strength of electric arc furnace slag-modified concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing worldwide population has increased the use of electric arc furnaces (EAF), resulting in a surge of EAF slag and a huge environmental concern. EAF slag's complex physical qualities have a considerable impact on concrete's mechanical performance, mainly its compressive strength (CS). This study introduces a novel framework for forecasting the CS of EAF slag concrete that uses advanced machine learning models such as Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), AdaBoost (ADB), Random Forest (RF), Hybrid XGB-RF, and Hybrid XGB-ADB. A full dataset of 730 samples was meticulously created, containing essential input parameters such as binders, aggregates, and other necessary variables, with CS as the desired outcome. Based on the findings, the XGB model showed highest accuracy, with an test R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.