Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069910›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Fault diagnosis of ORC expanders using a multiscale residual network with convolutional block attention.

Jing Li, Zexu Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing LiInstitute of Engineering Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China. lijing6332@ustb.edu.cn.
Zexu GaoInstitute of Engineering Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of China No. 61873025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanders in organic Rankine cycle systems serve as critical energy-conversion components in low-grade waste heat recovery installations, yet their reliable operation is threatened by faults such as bearing defects, rotor imbalance, and blade cracking. Conventional diagnostic methods often struggle with non-stationary vibration characteristics, class imbalance, and low signal-to-noise ratios inherent to these working environments. This paper proposes an improved deep residual network, referred to as multi-scale convolutional block attention module residual network, that integrates a multi-scale parallel feature extraction module with convolutional block attention mechanisms for intelligent fault diagnosis. The multi-scale module employs three parallel convolutional branches with different kernel sizes to simultaneously capture transient impulses, periodic modulation, and low-frequency envelope features across multiple temporal scales. Attention-enhanced residual blocks sequentially recalibrate channel and spatial responses to emphasize fault-sensitive features while suppressing noise interference. A training optimization scheme combining Focal Loss, cosine annealing, and targeted data augmentation is further introduced to address the small-sample imbalanced-data challenge. Five-fold cross-validation experiments conducted on a 10 kW single-screw expander test rig demonstrate that the proposed model achieves 98.11 ± 0.34% diagnostic accuracy across four health states, surpassing the standard deep residual network baseline by 6.57 percentage points, with only 3.27% relative accuracy degradation at 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Ablation studies confirm a multiplicative synergy between the multi-scale and attention modules, statistical significance tests validate the robustness of the observed improvements, and comparative evaluations against six benchmark methods demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismDeep residual networkExpander fault diagnosisMulti-scale feature extractionOrganic Rankine cycleVibration signal analysis

Identifiers

PMID42069910
PMCPMC13324522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.