ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-guided resampling and asymmetric fusion for ultra-high-frequency bolt-loosening detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable detection of bolt loosening in safety-critical infrastructure requires monitoring that captures microsecond-scale transients. However, processing 1 MHz vibration signals at the edge presents a fundamental dilemma: standard downsampling can smear sparse diagnostic impulses, whereas full-bandwidth processing is often computationally prohibitive. Here we propose PGRF-Net, a physics-guided deep learning framework that reconciles transient preservation with extreme compression. PGRF-Net integrates (1) a physics-guided resampling operator for high-rate vibration signals (e.g., 150 : 1 compression); (2) a heterogeneous gradient-spectral tensor representation that augments time-frequency information with morphology-aware channels; and (3) an asymmetric fusion module over two representations derived from the same signal (pseudo-image representation + waveform representation). On a six-class 1 MHz PVDF vibration dataset (109,668 segments; temporal-split test = 16,131), PGRF-Net reaches a best-run clean test accuracy of 95.12% under a block-wise temporal split. A strict file-disjoint split is also reported as a cross-scene hold-out protocol. On an independent Zenodo benchmark (3-fold file-disjoint CV, 9 runs per experiment), we evaluate the proposed pipeline together with three feature-engineering controls (Exp 501-503). These results support a practical compression-learning pipeline for industrial monitoring where both transient fidelity and computational efficiency are required.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.