ArticleScientific reports2026
Artistic style classification in traditional cultural heritage using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The automatic recognition of artistic styles is an important part of the management, analysis, and access to the huge digital cultural heritage archives. Nevertheless, the aesthetic complexity and minor distinctions between works of art become serious obstacles to this process. To overcome this, this study introduces a multi-stage, novel technique that, in comparison to current techniques, intelligently derives and combines local and global features to obtain a more comprehensive style representation. In the suggested approach, initially, the image is split into visual parts with the help of the K-means algorithm, and the local characteristics of each part are obtained with the help of specific CNNs. Simultaneously, a more detailed CNN obtains global features of the whole picture. The two sets of features are then intelligently fused with an attention mechanism. In the third step, an Autoencoder (AE) is employed to downsize the dimensions of the extracted features and eliminate noise and redundant data because of the large dimensionality of the extracted features. Lastly, a SoftMax classifier is used to perform classification. The proposed method was assessed using the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET) Public Archives dataset in this study. Our approach on the MET dataset had an 89.07% accuracy and F-measure of 0.8867, which proves it to be superior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.