SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
What is the most effective non-pharmacological treatment for poor sleep quality in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients? a systematic review.
Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) features poor sleep quality due to nocturnal dyspnea and psychological distress, leading to increased hospital admissions and reduced quality of life. Considering patient preference and existing evidence, non-pharmacological intervention, i.e. cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), on sleep for COPD patients had its potential efficacy. However, current guidelines do not include sleep management as standard care, and there is a lack of comprehensive reviews on this topic. This systematic review hence evaluated the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments for poor sleep in COPD patients.
methodsLiterature identification was conducted through MEDLINE, CINHAL PLUS, AMED and ScienceDirect under PRISMA guidance. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies regarding poor sleep quality among COPD population were retrieved. Abstract, title and full text screening were performed by the author and assessed by a second reviewer. Risk of bias and quality appraisal was done with JBI scale.
results12 articles (783 patients) were identified, including 9 randomized controlled trials, 1 cohort study and 2 cross-sectional studies. The risk of bias (quality) was ranked: low (high) for 3, moderate (moderate) for 7 and high (low) for 2. Several interventions were identified (number of study): CBT-I (2) and cognitive behavioral therapy (1), pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) (2), progressive muscle relaxation technique (PMRT) (2), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (3), relaxation exercise (RE) (1) and therapeutic touch (TT) (1). Significant improvement in sleep quality was reported in PMRT, TT and RE.
conclusionPMRT, TT and RE showed improvement in sleep quality in COPD patients yet unable to rank their effectiveness as heterogeneous outcome measures across studies. No substantial evidence was capable to demonstrate effectiveness of CBT-I, CBT, PR and NIV to explicit COPD patients. Moreover, future research including combination of non-pharmacological treatments is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.