ArticleScientific reports2026
Breast ultrasound images for segmentation and classification using multi-task U-Net.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast ultrasound imaging is widely used for the early detection of breast cancer due to its accessibility and effectiveness, particularly in dense breast tissues. However, its diagnostic performance is often affected by operator dependency, speckle noise, low contrast, and variability in data quality. Although deep learning methods have shown promise in automated tumor segmentation and classification, their clinical applicability remains limited due to challenges such as small and imbalanced datasets, inconsistent annotations, and the lack of integrated learning strategies. In this work, we propose a Multi-Task U-Net framework that jointly performs lesion segmentation and tumor classification by leveraging shared feature representations. The proposed method incorporates a deterministic oversampling strategy for handling class imbalance, a prediction-refinement module to ensure consistency between segmentation and classification outputs, and an attention-guided feature learning mechanism to enhance lesion localization. Additionally, a curated version of the BUSI dataset is constructed by removing duplicate and inconsistent samples to ensure reliable evaluation. The proposed model achieves a Dice score of up to 0.81 in comparative evaluation, along with classification accuracy of up to 0.96-0.98, demonstrating improved performance over baseline methods. The consistent performance across both segmentation and classification tasks indicates good generalization capability despite dataset limitations. Finally, the proposed multi-task framework provides an effective and reliable solution for automated breast cancer detection in ultrasound images and shows strong potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.