ArticleScientific reports2026
Utility of point-of-care platelet aggregation testing for transfusion prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification and initiation of therapy for life-threatening hemorrhage is essential to minimize patient morbidity and mortality. In primary hemostasis, platelet function is integral to reach this goal, but major hemorrhage leads to impaired platelet mechanical activation and aggregation. Current devices for measuring platelet function are cumbersome or not promptly available for clinical decision making in this setting. Within this manuscript we prospectively evaluate a novel, rapid assay utilizing measures of platelet aggregation to predict hemorrhage. In this prospective cohort study at an academic regional Level I trauma center, we included adult (> 16 years old) participants who were triaged as level I or II trauma activations. The primary exposure studied was platelet aggregation analyzed on a prototype device. The primary and secondary outcomes measured were life-threatening hemorrhage (death from hemorrhage or need for hemorrhage control procedure) and transfusion requirements of > 2 units of blood components, respectively. Standard descriptive statistics were used to characterize the cohort. Predictive outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression to compare: (1) the platelet aggregation assay; (2) clinical parameters (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and injury mechanism); and (3) a combined model. Of 761 patients, 482 patients met inclusion criteria for our study, 36 (7.5%) had life-threatening hemorrhage and 43 (8.9%) patients required > 2 units of blood transfusion. For life-threatening hemorrhage, platelet aggregation had an area under the curve (AUC): 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.69); clinical parameters AUC: 0.83 (CI 0.75-0.91); and the combined model AUC: 0.85 (CI 0.79-0.92) which was not significantly improved when compared to clinical parameters alone (p = 0.32). For transfusion of > 2 units, the platelet aggregation model had AUC: 0.68 (CI 0.61-0.76); clinical parameters AUC: 0.84 (CI 0.79-0.90); and combined model AUC: 0.88 (CI 0.83-0.93), improving transfusion prediction over clinical parameters alone (p = 0.013). In a cohort of traumatically injured patients, a novel, rapid measure of platelet aggregation enhanced well-established clinical parameters to predict the need for blood transfusion but not life-threatening hemorrhage. Future work should validate the clinical utility of this technology in a larger cohort and patients with significant non-traumatic hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.