Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069808›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A synthetic dataset for time series super-resolution with deep learning.

Julio Ibarra-Fiallo, D'hamar Agudelo-Moreno, Juan A Lara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julio Ibarra-FialloColegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Cumbayá, Ecuador. jibarra@usfq.edu.ec.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-4153
D'hamar Agudelo-MorenoColegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Cumbayá, Ecuador.
Juan A LaraUniversidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing application of time-series analysis in fields like biomedical engineering or telecommunications emphasizes the need for high-quality data to train and evaluate advanced machine learning models. Acquiring temporal data at suitable resolutions is often limited by ethical, economic, or practical constraints. We introduce CoSiBD (Complex Signal Benchmark Dataset for Super-Resolution), a synthetic dataset designed for reproducible time-series super-resolution research. CoSiBD provides 2,500 high-resolution signals (N = 5, 000 samples each over a reference domain τ ∈ [0, 4π]) with aligned low-resolution versions at four levels (150, 250, 500, and 1,000 samples) obtained via uniform decimation. Signals are generated with diverse non-stationary behaviors through piecewise frequency modulation and spline-based amplitude envelopes, and provides both clean and noisy variants. Signals are distributed as NumPy arrays, plain text, and JSON, with comprehensive metadata describing segment structure, generation parameters, and seeds for full reproducibility. Technical validation analyzes spectral properties and reports baseline SR benchmarking and transfer experiments on EEG and speech data.

Identifiers

PMID42069808
PMCPMC13342576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.