ArticleScientific reports2026
Metaheuristic-enhanced deep learning for monthly pan evaporation prediction under limited climatic data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces two recently developed bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms, Artificial Protozoa Optimizer (APO, 2024) and Dung Beetle Optimizer (DBO, 2023), into long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for monthly pan evaporation prediction under limited climatic data. Representing the first application of these algorithms to hydrological modeling, these models integrate APO and DBO into the LSTM framework to optimize hyperparameters and enhance accuracy and generalization. Their performance is benchmarked against the standard LSTM and two established hybrids, LSTM-GWO and LSTM-HHO. A case study in southeast China using 40 years of data from two stations shows that both LSTM-APO and LSTM-DBO consistently outperform the alternatives across three data-splitting scenarios (M1, M2, M3). For the best test case (M3, Station 1), LSTM-APO reduced RMSE and MAE by 46.5% and 47.2%, respectively, compared to the best LSTM, while in Station 2 (M2) it achieved reductions of 43.9% and 40.7%, with gains of about 9% in R² and NSE. LSTM-DBO also yielded notable improvements, reducing errors by 20-30% and demonstrating robust predictive stability. Visual analyses confirm that LSTM-APO provides predictions closely aligned with observations, with LSTM-DBO performing comparably well. These findings highlight the role of metaheuristic optimization in boosting LSTM performance for nonlinear evaporation processes with sparse inputs. Overall, APO- and DBO-based hybrids show strong promise for reliable pan evaporation forecasting. Future research should assess their real-time applicability and transferability across diverse climates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.