Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069805›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

OncoPT: long-context transformer models for in hospital tumor phenotype extraction from pathology reports.

Thanh Duong, Dung Le, Vonetta Williams, Sandra Stewart, Yayi Zhao, Muntasir Zitu, Issam El Naqa, Dana Rollison, Thanh Thieu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thanh DuongMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Dung LeMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Vonetta WilliamsMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Sandra StewartMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Yayi ZhaoMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Muntasir ZituMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Issam El NaqaMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Dana RollisonMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Thanh ThieuMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. thanh.thieu@moffitt.org.

Funding

NIH HHS P30 CA076292-25S4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in medical informatics, extracting tumor information from pathology reports remains a challenge in modern cancer registry and surveillance workflows. These documents often have an unstructured format, complex medical content, and a considerably lengthy context, creating significant challenges for automated phenotypic information extraction. Although some recent language models such as BERT, GatorTron, and GPT-4 have demonstrated efficacy in medical applications, they are either constrained by sequence length limitations or cloud-based computing that violates the handling of protected health information. We introduce two oncology pathology-optimized transformer models OncoPT, based on Longformer and BigBird architectures and trained on real-world pathology reports. OncoPT efficiently processes reports up to 4,096 tokens, making it suitable for hospitals' onsite deployment with limited resources. We apply OncoPT to a common malignancy (exemplified by breast cancer) and a rare malignancy (exemplified by gastric cancer), across five key tumor phenotypes: Subsite, Histology, Grade, Stage, and Laterality. The results demonstrate that OncoPT achieves state-of-the-art weighted F-1 on a private pathology dataset and surpasses commercial chatbots (ChatGPT 4o and o1) on the public CORAL dataset (up to 30% improvement). These findings highlight the robustness of OncoPT models with the added benefit of preserving the privacy of patient health information.

Identifiers

PMID42069805
PMCPMC13342586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.