ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid reverse knowledge distillation for adversarial example detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable success in various computer vision tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to adversarial examples-carefully crafted perturbations that are imperceptible to humans but cause misclassification. Detecting such adversarial inputs is crucial for deploying reliable AI systems, particularly in safety-critical applications such as medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. In this paper, we propose a novel adversarial detection method based on Hybrid Reverse Knowledge Distillation (Hybrid RKD). Our approach trains a multi-scale decoder to reconstruct intermediate feature representations of a frozen teacher encoder using only clean images. The key insight is that adversarial perturbations cause feature-level distortions that the decoder, trained exclusively on normal data, cannot accurately reconstruct. We further enhance detection performance by incorporating Mahalanobis-style statistical distance metrics that capture distribution-level anomalies. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ISIC2018 datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art detection performance against various adversarial attacks including FGSM, PGD, DeepFool, C&W, and AutoAttack, with average AUROC scores of 0.790 and 0.929 across five attack categories, respectively. Our hybrid approach consistently outperforms existing detection methods including LID, Mahalanobis, and ODIN, while requiring no adversarial examples during training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.