ReviewCardio-oncology (London, England)2026
Cardiotoxicity of monoclonal antibody-based therapies in breast cancer: a contemporary narrative review.
Review in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibody-based therapies have substantially improved outcomes in breast cancer, particularly through HER2-directed treatment strategies, but have also introduced important cardiovascular toxicities that require careful recognition and management. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on cardiotoxicity associated with monoclonal antibody therapies used in breast cancer, with emphasis on HER2-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and selected immune checkpoint inhibitors.Trastuzumab remains the best-characterized monoclonal antibody associated with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, most commonly presenting as left ventricular systolic dysfunction, particularly in patients previously exposed to anthracyclines or with baseline cardiovascular risk factors. Pertuzumab and currently available antibody-drug conjugates have not shown a major increase in cardiotoxic risk beyond that observed with established HER2-directed therapy, although long-term data remain limited for some newer agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are less commonly associated with cardiovascular toxicity, but may rarely cause severe immune-mediated complications, particularly myocarditis and also non-immune mediated toxicity such as cardiac dysfunction.Contemporary evaluation of cardiotoxicity increasingly relies on an integrated cardio-oncology framework incorporating left ventricular ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, and cardiac biomarkers, with growing recognition of subclinical dysfunction and right ventricular involvement. Current management strategies emphasize baseline cardiovascular risk assessment, risk-adapted surveillance, early initiation of heart failure therapy when indicated, and individualized multidisciplinary decision-making regarding continuation of anticancer treatment, including permissive cardiotoxicity in selected patients.As the use of monoclonal antibody therapies continues to expand, optimizing the balance between oncologic efficacy and cardiovascular safety remains a central goal of modern breast cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.