ArticleNPJ science of learning2026
Benefits of classroom remote microphone technology for inattentive children.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of remote microphone technology (RMT) for children with inattention and associated listening difficulties. A two-phase trial was conducted. Phase one was a 4-week randomized controlled crossover trial (n = 35), assessing listening and attention in noise with and without RMT. Phase two was a 30-week extension trial following participants continuing with RMT (n = 20) and controls (n = 17). Auditory processing, attention, memory and reading fluency were assessed before and after the extension. Questionnaires were administered throughout to monitor progress. In phase one, RMT use significantly improved speech intelligibility, listening comprehension, and auditory attention (P < 0.05). Participants reported improved classroom listening and ADHD symptoms (P < 0.05). In phase two, the experimental group showed greater improvement in reading fluency and self-reported quality of life (P < 0.01) compared to controls, with no significant differences in auditory processing or cognitive skills. These findings support RMT as an effective intervention for inattentive children with listening difficulties in educational settings. Clinical Trial Registration: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Registration date: 18/05/2023. Clinical Trial Numbers: ACTRN12623000512628. ACTRN12623000511639. Web links to study: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385642&isReview=true . https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385560&isReview=true .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.