Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069720›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A comprehensive inventory of communication tower infrastructure across the range of greater and Gunnison sage-grouse.

Sarah C Webster, Shawn Szabo, Jacqueline B Cupples, Shawn T O'Neil, Jonathan B Dinkins, Steve Abele, Jennifer M Hill, John C Tull, Michael P Chenaille, Peter S Coates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah C WebsterU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Reno Field Station, 1100 Valley Rd., Reno, NV, 89512, USA.
Shawn SzaboOregon State University, Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, 206 Withycombe, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Jacqueline B CupplesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Interior Region 9, 3502 Highway 30, La Grande, OR, 97850, USA.
Shawn T O'NeilU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.
Jonathan B DinkinsOregon State University, Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, 206 Withycombe, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Steve AbeleU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior Region 10, 1340 Financial Blvd, Suite 234, Reno, NV, 98502, USA.
Jennifer M HillU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior Region 7, 334 Parsley Blvd, Cheyenne, WY, 82007, USA.
John C TullU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Science Applications, 1340 Financial Boulevard, Reno, NV, 89502, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-008X
Michael P ChenailleU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.
Peter S CoatesU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA. pcoates@usgs.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compiled and verified a comprehensive inventory dataset of communication tower infrastructure across the range of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus), two species of conservation concern that are viewed as ecosystem health indicators for the entire sagebrush biome within the United States. Our dataset includes all known towers with emphasis on validating construction year and month for towers built between 1990-2023. The annual spatial time series format of the data allows users to visualize, assess, and download tower locations and duration (including dates of construction and dismantlement) across the sagebrush biome of the western U.S. Tower data were acquired from publicly available infrastructure databases and records were filtered to include communication tower structures within the area of interest. Data records were validated and checked for accuracy with high resolution aerial and satellite imagery, and a subset were verified during field visits. The final filtered dataset comprises 4,322 tower sites, of which 3,528 tower site locations were verified via satellite imagery or field visits, and 794 were unverified tower sites (tower presence could not be confirmed via satellite imagery). Each tower record includes geographic coordinates, structure height, estimated date of construction, number of towers at each site, and, if applicable, date of dismantlement. The data product closes spatiotemporal gaps and resolves discrepancies present in other public versions of similar data and can be used in ecological research, infrastructure planning/siting/permitting, decision support tools for biological or landscape management, environmental assessments, or general use pertaining to the historic and current locations of communication infrastructure across sagebrush ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemGalliformesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesSatellite ImageryUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42069720
PMCPMC13341788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.