ArticleNature communications2026
Shock-scattering micro-histotripsy-aided fine needle aspiration for enhanced biomarker profiling and cytopathology.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Core needle biopsy is the gold standard procedure for sampling tissues for pathology-based diagnostics. However, it produces significant tissue damage and may lead to undue pain and risk of complications such as infections. Alternatives such as fine needle aspiration and liquid biopsy have not yet achieved the same widespread utility owing to the limited abundance of cells and relevant biomarkers in extracted samples. Here we introduce a shock-scattering micro-histotripsy-aided fine needle aspiration technology which uses cavitation to liquefy nano-liter to micro-liter volumes to produce tissue homogenates with both intact and lysed cells. It permits not only conventional cytopathology with high success but sufficient high-quality tissue homogenates to enable reliable ancillary testing such as genetic biomarker profiling and even whole genome sequencing with improved quality compared to formalin-fixed samples. Our approach represents an advance in tissue diagnostics with orders of magnitude less damage than core-needle biopsy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.