ReviewStem cell research & therapy2026
Engineered cardiac patches from hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, with limited capacity for myocardial regeneration following infarction. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have become a promising therapeutic resource due to their scalability, differentiation potential, and immunologic adaptability. Engineered cardiac patches, three-dimensional constructs of hiPSC-CMs combined with supporting cells and scaffolds, offer a strategy to deliver organized myocardium directly to injured hearts, overcoming the limitations of cell injection therapies. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This review synthesizes evidence from 2010 to early 2025, spanning rodent, porcine, and non-human primate models, as well as the first clinical trials of hiPSC-CM patches. We highlight recent advances in maturation protocols, vascularization strategies, and scaffold engineering, while discussing two distinct translational paradigms: short-term paracrine support versus long-term remuscularization under sustained immunosuppression.
resultsPreclinical studies show that engineered patches improve graft survival, with engraftment rates ranging from 5 to 15%, alongside enhanced vascularization, electrical coupling, and left ventricular function. In large animal models, patches scaled to clinically relevant sizes achieved durable integration and improved hemodynamics. Of note, arrhythmogenic risk was lower than in intramyocardial injection models. Early human trials in Japan and Germany confirm feasibility and safety, with preliminary evidence of efficacy, including preliminary evidence of improved left ventricular ejection fraction and upgrades in NYHA functional class. Immunogenicity, graft maturation, and manufacturing scalability remain key hurdles, though innovations such as gene-edited hypoimmunogenic lines, multipronged maturation strategies, and bioreactor-based production offer potential solutions.
conclusionsEngineered hiPSC-CM cardiac patches represent a rapidly advancing frontier in regenerative cardiology. While early data indicate technical feasibility and measurable functional benefits, broader adoption will depend on resolving challenges of immune compatibility, arrhythmia prevention, and large-scale manufacturing. With coordinated progress in science, engineering, and regulation, cardiac patches may evolve into a transformative therapy for heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.