ArticleScientific reports2026
Deciphering seasonal dynamics and time series forecasting of urban air quality: a case study in Urban Cities of Andhra Pradesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper air quality forecasting is essential in developing countries such as India, where climate variability, industrialization, and increasing urbanization play a major role in degrading air quality and posing health risks. This research introduces an integrated machine learning (ML) architecture for the prediction of the Air Quality Index (AQI) in two Andhra Pradesh urban cities, Visakhapatnam and Vijayawada, and one city in Telangana, Hyderabad based on five years of pollutant and meteorological data. This approach combines a deep feedforward neural network (FNN) with residual blocks and several traditional regression techniques, viz., Random Forest, Lasso, and Gradient Boosting, to both predict AQI directly and impute it through pollutant-wise modeling in accordance with CPCB standards. Imposing a large amount of feature engineering like temporal lags, rolling statistics, and pollutant interactions was used to identify spatiotemporal dynamics. The unified advanced FNN model attained [Formula: see text] values of 0.965, 0.97, and 0.96, and Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of 10.0, 11.25, and 13.17 for Vijayawada, Hyderabad, and Visakhapatnam respectively. Furthermore, predictions for pollutant-specific values in 2025 showed close conformity with real AQI values ([Formula: see text], RMSE = 2.68, 5.84, 5.30 for Random Forest for Vijayawada, Hyderabad, Visakhapatnam respectively) when predicted from estimated pollutant concentrations. This research illustrates a scalable method for AQI forecasting that is capable of informing real-time policy and public health intervention in data-scarce settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.