Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069686›Full record

ReviewNature communications2026

Swimming with robots: investigating fish locomotion, sensing, and schooling behavior with robotic swimmers.

Auke Ijspeert, Francesco Mondada, Emily Standen, Guy Theraulaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Auke IjspeertEPFL-BioRobotics Laboratory, ME D1 1226, Station 9, Lausanne, Switzerland. auke.ijspeert@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-9980
Francesco MondadaEPFL-MOBOTS, MEB3426, Station 9, Lausanne, Switzerland. francesco.mondada@epfl.ch.
Emily StandenUniversity of Ottawa, Comparative and Evolutionary Biomechanics Laboratory, 160 Gendron Hall, 30 Marie Curie Pvt., Ottawa, ON, Canada. estanden@uottawa.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-1957
Guy TheraulazCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. guy.theraulaz@univ-tlse3.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish display remarkable locomotor and social abilities, from efficient swimming to coordinated schooling, that have inspired the design of various robotic fish. While robotics has largely benefited from biology, fish-like robots are increasingly used as scientific tools to investigate fundamental questions in biomechanics, sensorimotor control, and collective behavior. This paper reviews how robotic models have been employed to study the neuromechanical basis of swimming, the role of sensory feedback in locomotion, and the mechanisms underlying social interactions in schools. We list open questions in biology and show that robotic approaches provide unique advantages to address them: they enable repeatable experiments, systematic variation of body and control parameters, and direct measurement of otherwise inaccessible quantities such as internal forces or energy use. A literature analysis reveals, however, that only a minority of robot-fish studies contribute to biological understanding, with most focusing on engineering design. Among biology-oriented studies, closed-loop robotic systems-capable of real-time adaptation-remain underrepresented but are essential for probing sensorimotor and social feedback mechanisms. We conclude by outlining future directions combining robotics, simulations, and emerging experimental technologies to unravel the multi-scale feedback loops that shape fish locomotion and schooling.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalFishesRoboticsSwimmingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFeedback, SensoryLocomotionSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID42069686
PMCPMC13241534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.