ReviewNature communications2026
Swimming with robots: investigating fish locomotion, sensing, and schooling behavior with robotic swimmers.
Review in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Biological Mechanisms to Task-Oriented Design Principles: A Critical Review of Fish-like Biomimetic Robots.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fish display remarkable locomotor and social abilities, from efficient swimming to coordinated schooling, that have inspired the design of various robotic fish. While robotics has largely benefited from biology, fish-like robots are increasingly used as scientific tools to investigate fundamental questions in biomechanics, sensorimotor control, and collective behavior. This paper reviews how robotic models have been employed to study the neuromechanical basis of swimming, the role of sensory feedback in locomotion, and the mechanisms underlying social interactions in schools. We list open questions in biology and show that robotic approaches provide unique advantages to address them: they enable repeatable experiments, systematic variation of body and control parameters, and direct measurement of otherwise inaccessible quantities such as internal forces or energy use. A literature analysis reveals, however, that only a minority of robot-fish studies contribute to biological understanding, with most focusing on engineering design. Among biology-oriented studies, closed-loop robotic systems-capable of real-time adaptation-remain underrepresented but are essential for probing sensorimotor and social feedback mechanisms. We conclude by outlining future directions combining robotics, simulations, and emerging experimental technologies to unravel the multi-scale feedback loops that shape fish locomotion and schooling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.