ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
Legacy effects of cover cropping and crop phase on soybean health and associated rhizosphere microbiome in corn-soybean rotation.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCrop diversification through crop rotation or cover cropping is widely recognized as an important strategy to improve agroecosystem sustainability, enhance soil health, and suppress soilborne diseases. Rotating crops or introducing cover crops can disrupt pathogen life cycles, improve nutrient cycling, and promote beneficial microbes. However, the outcomes of diversification practices are often complex, influenced by soil type, crops, and pathogen pressures. Evaluating how cover crops and crop phase affect crop soilborne diseases and root-associated microbiome is critical for designing resilient cropping systems.
resultsThis study evaluated the legacy effects of cover crops and crop phase on soybean root diseases and root-associated microbiome. Soybean plants were grown in soils collected from a corn-soybean rotation field experiment with and without cover crops, and then challenged with either Fusarium graminearum inoculum or soybean cyst nematode (SCN) in the growth chamber. Soils with a cover crop history significantly reduced F. graminearum-induced root rot, but had a limited impact on SCN, indicating divergent disease responses. Microbial profiling revealed that F. graminearum inoculum strongly reshaped bacterial communities, reducing Shannon diversity and enriching fast-growing copiotrophic taxa, including Bacteroidota genera (Pedobacter, Chitinophaga, Flavobacterium, and Mucilaginibacter) and Proteobacteria genera (Dyella, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Paraburkholderia) regardless of cover crops. In contrast, SCN infection increased bacterial Shannon diversity in soybean-phase soils regardless of cover crops but decreased fungal Shannon diversity in soybean soils without cover crops, highlighting pathogen-specific microbial shifts. Cover cropping enhanced microbial heterogeneity under both pathogen pressures, enriching microbial taxa potentially involved in nutrient cycling (Chitinophaga and Mucilaginibacter), antagonism (Flavobacterium, Streptomyces, Pseudonocardia, and Nocardioides), and competitive interactions (Paraburkholderia). Correlation analyses further linked specific bacterial and fungal genera with disease suppression.
conclusionsSoilborne pathogens and cropping practices exerted interconnected, pathogen- and crop-specific effects on root microbial communities. Cover cropping offers a promising strategy to enhance microbial-mediated disease resilience in soybean systems, providing ecological insights into microbiome-driven plant health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.