ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026
Defining peptides in ChEBI.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern biochemistry is producing vast amounts of chemical knowledge. Ontologies, such as the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) ontology, can help organising this knowledge. With manual classification alone however, ontologies cannot keep up with the growth of their domain. In this work, we propose a novel taxonomy of 67 classes related to peptides, a large branch in ChEBI with nearly 15,000 compounds. The existing natural language definitions in ChEBI have been expanded and specified more precisely. These natural language definitions are accompanied by a logical axiomatisation in monadic second-order logic (MSOL). To use the axiomatisation for automated classification, a methodology has been developed that translates monadic second-order definitions first into partial first-order definitions and finally into an algorithmic classification. This connects three aspects important to ontological definitions: They reflect the opinions of experts, they are unambiguous, and they can be checked automatically. In our evaluation, we compare the results of our classification to the current taxonomy of ChEBI . This reveals potential inconsistencies in ChEBI as well as areas that might benefit from automated extensions. We also evaluate our natural-language definitions in an expert survey.Scientific contribution: This work provides precise natural-language definitions of 14 current ChEBI classes as well as 53 new peptide-related classes. These definitions are formalised in MSOL and come with an efficient implementation that allows for large-scale molecule classification, including a full classification of ChEBI and PubChem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.