ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2026
Normative modeling reveals functional connectivity heterogeneity in internet gaming disorder.
Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInternet gaming disorder (IGD) is associated with abnormal functional connectivity (FC) in brain networks. However, findings from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies are highly inconsistent, likely due to individual heterogeneity in IGD-related neural alterations-a feature commonly observed in other psychiatric disorders but understudied in IGD.
methodsWe applied normative modeling to nucleus accumbens (NAcc) seed-to-voxel resting-state FC to derive individualized deviation (Z) maps for 173 IGD participants relative to age- and sex-adjusted normative ranges from 232 healthy controls. We then performed exploratory unsupervised clustering of network-level deviation features across three sample data, three atlas templates, and two clustering algorithms, selecting the optimal number of clusters using the silhouette criterion.
resultsIGD showed marked heterogeneity in FC deviations: voxel-level deviations were largely idiosyncratic in both spatial distribution and direction. When deviations were summarized at the network level, clustering consistently selected a two-cluster solution across data, atlases, and algorithms, separating a majority "low-deviation" stratum from a smaller "high-deviation" stratum.
conclusionsIGD is characterized by pronounced individual variability in FC deviations. Network-level deviations yield a robust higher- vs. lower-deviation stratification, although the present findings do not support interpreting this pattern as evidence for discrete subtypes. The present study highlights the utility of individualized deviation mapping beyond conventional case-control analyses for characterizing heterogeneity in IGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.