Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069657›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026

Gut microbiome modulates breast cancer risk in socially isolated mice.

Fabia de Oliveira Andrade, Christopher Staley, Lu Jin, Melike Ozgul-Onal, Maddie McDermott, Sercan Kenanoglu, Karla Andrade de Oliveira, Vivek Verma, Leena Hilakivi-Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabia de Oliveira AndradeThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Christopher StaleyDepartment of Surgery, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, MN, 55455, Minneapolis, USA.
Lu JinThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Melike Ozgul-OnalThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Maddie McDermottThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Sercan KenanogluThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Karla Andrade de OliveiraThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Vivek VermaThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA.
Leena Hilakivi-ClarkeThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, 55912, USA. hilak001@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer risk and mortality are associated with disrupted gut microbiome functions which in turn can affect tumor immune responses. One source of disruption could be stress. Social isolation (SI) stress consistently increases breast cancer risk and mortality in preclinical models and women, but whether SI promotes mammary tumor growth by affecting gut microbiome has not been studied.

methodsWe investigated if increased E0771 mammary tumorigenesis in SI female C57BL/6 mice was associated with changes in their gut microbiome by treating mice with an antibiotic mix that suppresses bacterial abundance and by performing fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from SI or group-housed (GH) donors to GH host. The effect of SI on anti-tumor CD8 + T and immunosuppressive Foxp3 + Treg cells was also studied.

resultsFecal bacteria that were present at different abundances between GH and SI mice were short chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers, and the most consistent change across three replicate studies was decreased fecal abundance of Akkermansia genus in SI mice. In addition, fecal propionic acid levels were reduced in SI mice, compared with GH mice, in agreement with Akkermansia being propionic acid producer. SI reduced the activation of CD8 + T cells systemically and in the tumor microenvironment, while the levels and activation of immunosuppressive Foxp3 Tregs were increased. Antibiotic treatment reversed increased mammary tumorigenesis and immunosuppression in SI mice but did not affect GH mice. Further, FMT from SI donors increased tumor growth in GH host, compared with FMT from GH donor.

conclusionGut dysbiosis caused by SI may be driving their increased mammary tumorigenesis, potentially through gut dysbiosis induced immunosuppression.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryBreast cancerGut dysbiosisImmunosuppressionSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID42069657
PMCPMC13312772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.