Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069651›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

SCMBench: benchmarking domain-specific and foundation models for single-cell multi-omics data integration.

Yixuan Wang, Yimin Fan, Xuesong Wang, Tingyang Yu, Yongshuo Zong, Xinyuan Liu, Gaoyang Zhong, Meitong Liu, Qing Li, Kin Hei Lee and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yixuan WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8989-3129
Yimin FanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6514-5588
Xuesong WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-0017
Tingyang YuDepartment of Information Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yongshuo ZongSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Xinyuan LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Gaoyang ZhongDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Meitong LiuDepartment of Computer Science, HKU, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Qing LiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5628-678X
Kin Hei LeeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6832-9863
Khachatur DallakyanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1555-6581
Zhichao HuDepartment of Information Technology & Operations Management, Nanyang Business School, NTU, Singapore, Singapore.
Yaqian QiQuantitative Methods and Modeling, Baruch College, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Junjie HuangJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Gengjie JiaGenome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2881-962X
Jiao YuanGMU-GIBH Joint School of Life Sciences, The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory for Cell Fate Regulation and Diseases, Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-2319
Ting-Fung ChanSchool of Life Sciences, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-3884
Xin GaoComputer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7108-3574
Irwin KingDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yu LiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CUHK, Hong Kong SAR, China. liyu@cse.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-6722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in single-cell sequencing technologies have led to the generation of vast amounts of multi-omics data, spurring the development of numerous integration tools. While multi-omics integration has significantly advanced cell research, there is still a lack of comprehensive evaluations and guidelines for these tools. This study benchmarks Domain-specific Models (DMs) and Foundation Models (FMs) for multi-omics data integration, assessing 23 methods with optimized hyperparameters on integration accuracy, biomarker detection, trajectory inference, and quantitative batch effect correction. We address current gaps in assessing the efficacy and limitations of FMs compared to DMs in the multi-omics integration task. Importantly, our comprehensive analysis goes beyond basic integration accuracy, focusing on the preservation of cellular characteristics, transcriptomic biomarkers, epigenomic regulatory elements, and development trajectories. This holistic approach enables researchers to extract meaningful insights from integration results, facilitating a deeper understanding of individual cells. Generally, we find FMs fall short of state-of-the-art DMs in this field. To bridge this performance gap, we propose a lightweight adaptation strategy that enhances their effectiveness in this task. Our findings serve as a guide for researchers in selecting suitable integration methods for specific single-cell analysis objectives and provide insights for future model design.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMultiomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsBenchmarkingEpigenomicsHumansTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID42069651
PMCPMC13342640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.