ArticleNature communications2026
SCMBench: benchmarking domain-specific and foundation models for single-cell multi-omics data integration.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Context-dependent immune regulation: a mechanistic and AI-enabled integrative framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in single-cell sequencing technologies have led to the generation of vast amounts of multi-omics data, spurring the development of numerous integration tools. While multi-omics integration has significantly advanced cell research, there is still a lack of comprehensive evaluations and guidelines for these tools. This study benchmarks Domain-specific Models (DMs) and Foundation Models (FMs) for multi-omics data integration, assessing 23 methods with optimized hyperparameters on integration accuracy, biomarker detection, trajectory inference, and quantitative batch effect correction. We address current gaps in assessing the efficacy and limitations of FMs compared to DMs in the multi-omics integration task. Importantly, our comprehensive analysis goes beyond basic integration accuracy, focusing on the preservation of cellular characteristics, transcriptomic biomarkers, epigenomic regulatory elements, and development trajectories. This holistic approach enables researchers to extract meaningful insights from integration results, facilitating a deeper understanding of individual cells. Generally, we find FMs fall short of state-of-the-art DMs in this field. To bridge this performance gap, we propose a lightweight adaptation strategy that enhances their effectiveness in this task. Our findings serve as a guide for researchers in selecting suitable integration methods for specific single-cell analysis objectives and provide insights for future model design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.