ArticleReproductive health2026
Abortion care pathways in Addis Ababa healthcare facilities: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding how women navigate induced abortion care pathways is critical to ensuring person-centred, quality reproductive health services. Evidence indicates that persistent abortion stigma, the lack of choices of abortion methods and respectful care during abortion remain a global challenge to reproductive healthcare. Yet there is minimal evidence regarding abortion care pathways. This study explored induced abortion care pathways in Addis Ababa healthcare facilities.
methodsWe used a descriptive qualitative approach, adopting purposive sampling techniques to recruit women who sought induced abortion care from seven facilities. The data were collected from May to July 2024. In-depth semi-structured interviews with sixteen women were digitally recorded and transcribed into the local language before being translated into English. Data were coded, organised, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsFive main themes and their corresponding subthemes were developed through data analysis. Themes were: (i) social and emotional support, (ii) moral and social meanings shaping abortion care, (iii) accessibility and service delivery, (iv) perceived competency of abortion providers, and (v) physical and emotional effects of abortion. Many women attended the clinic alone, without their families, and received no support. Women often sought care at clinics away from their community due to concerns related to fear of stigma and social pressure. This study found long waiting times to receive abortion care, a lack of medicine and ultrasound at some facilities and limited availability of second-trimester abortions. Women reported that many providers were welcoming and competent, while others reported poor communication, the use of medical jargon, and stigmatising behaviours. Participant reported pressure to accept methods they did not want during contraceptive counselling and fear of breaches in privacy and confidentiality. Participants also described physical symptoms such as bleeding and pain, and felt ashamed and upset after the abortion, which could be associated with negative experiences.
conclusionsInadequate social support, abortion stigma, and barriers to accessing abortion services, such as long waiting times and insufficient resources, were identified as significant gaps. These findings emphasised the need to strengthen person-centred abortion care and address systemic and socio-cultural barriers that undermine the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.