ArticlePlant methods2026
Hybrid metaheuristic optimization of a DeepFusionNet for plant leaf disease diagnosis and recommendation.
Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of plant leaf diseases plays an important role in protecting crop yields and supporting sustainable agriculture. This paper proposes an improved DeepFusionNet model optimized through a hybrid Flower Pollination Algorithm and Butterfly Optimization Algorithm, balancing global exploration with local refinement for faster and more stable convergence. The model combines DenseNet201 and MobileNetV2 by compressing their final convolutional feature maps with 1×1 convolutions and fusing them along the channel dimension to form a compact and discriminative representation. This fused representation is then classified using a Random Forest classifier. This framework consistently achieves high accuracy on all eight datasets, with performance ranging between 97.07% and 99.66%. Extensive experiments are performed that include statistical validation, convergence studies, and reliability tests to prove the robustness of the approach. Furthermore, to make it practically useful, the whole system is embedded into a mobile application capable of real-time disease detection and providing actionable recommendations to farmers for the effective treatment and prevention of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.