Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069632›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2026

Exploring the moral status of cadavers through artificial intelligence: a thematic analysis of AI-based perspectives in anatomy education.

Ibrahim Topcu, Burak Karip, Perihan Demir, Beyzanur Kac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ibrahim TopcuDepartment of History of Medicine and Ethics, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. ibrahim.topcu@sbu.edu.tr.
Burak KaripDepartment of Anatomy, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Perihan DemirDepartment of Medical History and Ethics, Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Beyzanur KacDepartment of History of Medicine and Ethics, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCadavers play an irreplaceable role in anatomy education, offering unique opportunities for hands-on learning and the internalization of ethical values. While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in medical education, their perspectives on the moral status of cadavers remain underexplored.

methodsThis study examined the responses of four LLMs-ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Copilot-regarding the concept, significance, and ethical responsibilities toward cadavers. A thematic analysis was conducted based on the AI-generated responses.

resultsThree main themes emerged: (1) The Meaning of the Cadaver, where all LLMs preferred the term "donor," reflecting respect for the body's human origin and voluntary contribution to science; (2) The Importance of the Cadaver, emphasizing its educational superiority over models and simulations due to realism, anatomical variation, and ethical learning; and (3) Attitudes and Responsibilities, where LLMs expressed moral, ethical, legal, and academic responsibilities, highlighting respect, non-maleficence, and professional conduct. LLMs also acknowledged that donor-related terminology and background knowledge influence learners' attitudes.

conclusionsLarge language models attribute moral value to cadavers based on their human origin and educational role. While not granting full personhood, they support respectful and ethically guided engagement. These findings suggest that LLMs, when integrated into medical education, may reinforce ethical awareness and serve as potential tools for promoting professional identity formation.

Indexed as

AnatomyArtificial IntelligenceMoral StatusCadaverGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsAnatomy EducationArtificial IntelligenceCadaverMoral ObligationsProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID42069632
PMCPMC13159244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.