Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Effects of multi-sensory virtual reality training on gait adaptability and somatomotor network remodeling in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of virtual reality technology on balance ability intervention in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions on Neuropathic Pain in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of multisensory-integrated virtual reality (VR) training on gait adaptability and its regulatory mechanisms on the somatomotor network (SMN) in patients with stroke.
methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with stroke were allocated to a VR group (multisensory-integrated VR training) or a control group (conventional rehabilitation). Both groups received 30-minute sessions, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was gait adaptability assessed by the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). Secondary outcomes included the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity (FMA-LE). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured resting-state functional connectivity within the SMN and task-evoked activation during stepping and obstacle crossing.
resultsThe VR group showed significantly greater improvements than the control group in DGI total score (P = 0.010), TUGT (P = 0.005), and BBS (P < 0.001 ). fNIRS analysis revealed that the VR group exhibited significantly greater increases in task-evoked activation in the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and supplementary motor area (SMA) during stepping (P = 0.029 and P = 0.032, respectively), and in the right SMA during unaffected-limb obstacle crossing (P = 0.048). Resting-state functional connectivity analysis showed significantly enhanced connections within the SMN, including left SMA-right PPC and right PPC-left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (both P < 0.05). Correlation analyses revealed that increased right SMA activation during obstacle crossing was positively correlated with TUGT improvement (r = 0.590, P = 0.001), while enhanced right PPC-left DLPFC connectivity was positively correlated with DGI improvement (r = 0.403, P = 0.041).
conclusionMultisensory-integrated VR training was associated with improvements in gait adaptability and balance in patients with stroke. The underlying mechanisms may involve enhanced activation in the SMA and PPC, along with changes in functional connectivity within the SMN and between the SMN and cognitive control networks. However, given that the significant improvements in DGI, TUGT, and BBS were not sustained under the most conservative assumptions about missing data, these findings should be considered preliminary and warrant confirmation in studies with lower attrition rates.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500111919 (retrospectively registered). Registered 7 November 2025. Available from https//www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR2500111919). Protocol The full trial protocol is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.