ArticleMalaria journal2026
Impact of the 2023-armed conflict on routine malaria imapact indicators in Sudan (January 2020-March 2025): a mixed-methods analysis of surveillance data.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria constitutes a major public health burden in Sudan, accounting for most outpatient visits and hospital admissions across approximately 80% of the states. The armed conflict beginning in April 2023 severely disrupted an already fragile health system, affecting the surveillance system infrastructure. No prior studies have assessed the impact of conflict on routine malaria surveillance data reported through District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2). This study evaluated the effects of conflict on completeness and reporting of malaria impact indicators data across Sudanese states.
methodsA mixed-methods design combined quantitative analysis of quarterly DHIS2 data (January 2020-March 2025) from 17 states with qualitative exploration of surveillance system functionality. Quantitative analysis included descriptive analyses and interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) of three malaria impact indicators: quarterly reported malaria cases (presumed and confirmed) per 100,000 state population, test positivity rate (RDT + microscopy), and quarterly inpatient malaria deaths per 100,000 state population. Data completeness was quantified as the proportion of missing quarterly reports per state. Descriptive analysis graphs illustrate pre- and post-conflict trends and missing data patterns. ITSA was conducted for 11 states with complete post-conflict time series; six states with incomplete data were excluded. Three key informant interviews with national- and state-level malaria programme managers, selected from severe and less severe conflict-affected states, provided contextual insights. Qualitative data were analyzed using a deductive framework approach.
resultsMissing DHIS2 reporting increased substantially after April 2023. Inter-state variation was observed: western and southern states (except North Kordofan) experienced persistent data gaps, whereas northern and eastern states maintained relatively continuous reporting despite declining trends. Qualitative findings indicated stronger surveillance functionality in less-affected states by conflict. ITSA showed a statistically significant decline in quarterly reported malaria case rates per 100,000 state population at conflict quarter (p = 0.02), with no significant post-conflict trend change. Key informants identified health facility destruction, workforce shortages, unpaid salaries, and communication breakdowns as major barriers.
conclusionThe conflict coincided with widening disparities in malaria surveillance across states, reflecting underlying inequalities in health system capacity. Strengthening states' surveillance systems is critical in conflict-affected settings. Future research should examine locality-level impacts to better capture subnational variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.