ArticleBMC health services research2026
Bridging systems and selves: a qualitative exploration of peer navigation as a developmentally tailored engagement strategy for adolescent HIV services.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation components and delivery structures of adolescent peer navigation as a workforce model: a scoping review.BMC global and public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent peer navigation is a promising strategy to improve engagement and health outcomes among adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV), yet youth-focused models remain underdeveloped and poorly documented, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) Rafiki Centre in Eldoret, Kenya-one of Africa's largest adolescent health centers-employs young adults living with HIV as peer navigators to support clients aged 14-24. Peer navigators meet defined eligibility criteria, including secondary school completion, ART adherence, and viral suppression, and are employed until age 25. Their compensation is supported primarily by USAID/PEPFAR-funded annual stipends, placing them outside formal health workforce structures and limiting access to employment benefits. This study addresses a critical evidence gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the structure, functioning, and perceived impact of this adolescent peer navigator model.
methodsIn June 2024, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 23 participants: eight current peer navigators, six former navigators, and nine health care workers who supervise or collaborate with peers. Interviews explored peer roles, training, supervision, program strengths and challenges, and perceived effects on adolescent outcomes. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, combining deductive codes based on interview domains with inductively generated themes.
resultsParticipants described peer navigators as central to adolescent engagement, trust-building, and improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Shared lived experience allowed peers to normalize HIV, promote adherence, reduce stigma, facilitate disclosure, and strengthen adolescents' self-acceptance and coping. Peer navigation functioned as a bidirectional bridging mechanism: peers guided adolescents through clinical and social systems while conveying youth realities back to providers, enhancing responsiveness and equity. Peers, however, reported significant emotional burden, safety concerns during community visits, and challenges maintaining boundaries with clients. Structural vulnerabilities were prominent; reliance on donor-funded stipends without formal recognition, living wages, or benefits created job insecurity, undermined professional legitimacy, and threatened program sustainability.
conclusionsThe Rafiki Centre's program demonstrates how adolescent peer navigation can advance youth-friendly HIV care by integrating lived experience into health systems in ways that improve adherence, reduce stigma, and enhance psychosocial well-being. Yet the same features that make peer navigation effective also create vulnerabilities that require institutional support. Strategic frameworks and institutional structures that allow timely and honorable entry and exit of peer roles, support in transitioning to other opportunities, and protections for physical, emotional and financial safety are essential for sustaining and scaling this developmentally attuned, equity-promoting model of adolescent HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.