ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Patient considerations in trauma-focused treatment decision-making: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common psychiatric condition, with a global prevalence of 3.9% and a lifetime prevalence of 7.4% in the Netherlands. Although numerous evidence-based treatments are available, their use varies considerably. Understanding patient perspectives and experiences in the decision-making process when choosing a specific treatment is crucial for improving the quality of care.
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the decision-making process from the perspective of patients with PTSD, focusing on their considerations and experiences when choosing a specific psychotherapeutic treatment.
methodsIn this qualitative study, twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients with PTSD (aged 21-55 years) receiving care at a mental health organisation in the east of the Netherlands. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory-inspired analytic techniques. Analysis was iterative and inductive, focusing on the identification and interpretation of patterns of meaning across patients' accounts.
resultsFive themes were identified, connected through an overarching interpretive concept of patient-attunement: (1) the role of treatment characteristics (2), the role of therapeutic factors (3), the role of treatment duration and intensity (4), the role of significant others, and (5) the role of information about trauma-focused treatment. Patients emphasised the importance of personalised information and support from clinicians and significant others. Ongoing responsiveness within the therapeutic relationship, including trust and collaboration, was central to experiencing the decision-making process as supportive and meaningful.
conclusionsFor patients with post-traumatic stress disorder, multiple factors play a role in choosing a psychotherapeutic trauma-focused treatment. This study shows that continued attunement to patients' diverse needs is central to the decision-making process. Such attunement may take various forms, including attention to the therapeutic relationship, discussion of treatment characteristics and frequency, and responsiveness to patients' preferences regarding information provision. Involving patients' support systems may further support decision-making. Together, these findings suggest that clinicians should remain attentive to patients' needs at multiple points during the pre-treatment phase. Approaches such as shared decision-making may help facilitate this attunement. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.