ArticleBMC public health2026
Falls prevention for older adults in outdoor public spaces: an interdisciplinary Delphi consensus on risks, actions, and barriers.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls are the leading cause of accidental injury among older adults, 30% of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and over fall each year, with nearly half occurring outdoors. These falls are complex, understudied, and insufficiently addressed in current age-friendly cities or walkability frameworks. This study aimed to build interdisciplinary consensus on risks, preventive actions, and barriers to fall prevention in outdoor public spaces through a Delphi process.
methodsA three-phase Delphi study was conducted with 64 participants in round 1, 60 in round 2, and 49 in round 3, including four expert groups: older adults who had fallen outdoors, health and research professionals, urban planners, and decision-makers (local and regional policy-makers, elected officials, and public-space managers involved in urban planning). Phase one collected open responses on risks, preventive actions (modification of physical layout, public-space management, and behavior-related factors), and barriers to these actions. Responses were synthesized using AI-assisted analysis with systematic human validation. In phases two and three, the relevance of 124 propositions were rated on a 10-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of ratings ≥ 7/10 and interquartile range ≤ 2.5.
resultsConsensus was reached for key intrinsic factors such as gait and balance impairments, visual and vestibular deficits, cognitive decline, and polypharmacy, as well as for environmental factors including irregular or inappropriate surfaces, obstacles, or signage, and crowding. Highly relevant preventive actions included integrating fall prevention into street and sidewalk design, training urban planning professionals, awareness campaigns, systematic maintenance, safer crossings, participatory co-design public-space adaptations and urban design features involving older adults and local stakeholders, and improved data monitoring through surveillance, mapping, and sharing of fall-related and environmental risk information. Main barriers were insufficient budgets, high costs, limited integration of fall prevention into planning priorities, and lack of evaluation of the impact of implemented actions.
conclusionsOutdoor fall prevention is a transversal challenge requiring integration of public health and urban planning. This Delphi highlights actionable priorities to embed fall prevention in local and national strategies, in particular in rapidly aging regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.