SynthesisBMC public health2026
Can exercise snacks alleviate musculoskeletal discomfort in prolonged sitting? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSedentary behavior constitutes a significant global public health issue and is strongly associated with musculoskeletal disorders, particularly neck and back pain. Exercise snacks, characterized by brief bouts of fragmented physical activity, provide a feasible intervention to interrupt prolonged sitting within occupational contexts. However, their efficacy in alleviating musculoskeletal discomfort has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of exercise snacks in reducing musculoskeletal discomfort in sedentary populations.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE up to November 1, 2025, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults (aged ≥ 18 years) in sedentary occupations were included. Eligible studies compared interventions that interrupted prolonged sitting with exercise snacks against a control condition of uninterrupted sitting or passive rest. The primary outcome was musculoskeletal discomfort, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.
resultsSix RCTs involving 210 participants were included in the review. Interventions varied in modality (stretching, walking, stair climbing, dynamic contractions) and duration (2 to 10 min). Four studies demonstrated that exercise snacks significantly alleviated musculoskeletal discomfort compared to prolonged sitting or passive rest. Interventions incorporating targeted muscle stretching, strengthening, or moderate-intensity activities (e.g., stair climbing) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to low-intensity walking or passive controls. However, heterogeneity in study design was observed, and notably, five of the six studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias, limiting the strength of these findings.
conclusionsOverall, interrupting prolonged sitting with exercise snacks may represent a feasible strategy to alleviate musculoskeletal discomfort in sedentary populations. Exercise snacks appear superior to passive rest; however, due to the substantial heterogeneity and high risk of bias across the majority of included studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Future high-quality, long-term RCTs in real-world settings are warranted to establish robust guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.