ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Clinical value and safety of liver biopsy in patients with liver failure.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the safety, etiological diagnostic value, and impact on clinical treatment decisions of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) in patients with liver failure.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with liver failure who underwent liver biopsy between January 1, 2017, and November 30, 2025. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, post-procedural adverse events, and pathological diagnoses were collected and subjected to statistical analysis.
resultsA total of 53 patients with liver failure were included, comprising 40 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and 13 patients with acute or subacute liver failure. 13 patients received TJLB, all of whom had ACLF. Compared with the PLB, patients in the TJLB group had a higher international normalized ratio (INR) [1.61 (1.32, 1.98)], a lower platelet count (PLT) [89.00 (73.00, 129.00) × 10⁹/L], and were more frequently complicated by moderate to large ascites. Both PLB and TJLB were successfully performed, with a low overall complication rate and no serious adverse events. Even among patients with marked coagulation abnormalities or concomitant ascites, TJLB demonstrated acceptable safety. Histopathological examination following liver biopsy enables reclassification of both chronic liver disease etiologies and acute precipitating factors in patients with ACLF, as well as etiological diagnoses in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) or subacute liver failure (SALF). A substantial proportion of drug- or toxin-related acute liver injury was identified by histopathological examination (n = 32, 60%), leading to a decreased proportion of liver failure with unclear etiology. Based on the pathological diagnosis, treatment strategies were modified in 11% of patients, including the initiation or continuation of specific therapeutic regimens.
conclusionsIn patients with liver failure, liver biopsy provides crucial information for determining the etiology and guiding clinical decision-making. With appropriate selection of the biopsy approach and patient population, TJLB can serve as a safe and feasible option, particularly for patients with coagulation disorders or severe ascites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.