ArticlePlacenta2026
Biologically inspired digital histology for deep phenotyping of placental composition changes across major lesion types.
Article in Placenta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlacental histopathology provides important insights into maternal and fetal health, yet the organ's spatial heterogeneity poses significant challenges for objective and reproducible histological analysis. Systematic assessment of cellular and structural composition across placental slides remains limited by the scale and subjectivity of manual evaluation. Quantitative approaches are therefore needed to characterise placental responses to injury beyond visually apparent lesions.
methodsWe applied the Histology Analysis Pipeline.PY (HAPPY), a biologically inspired hierarchical deep learning framework for quantitative single-cell-resolution analysis of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) slides, to 130 placental parenchyma slides from 62 singleton full-term live births. The dataset included healthy normal controls and four common placental lesion types: infarction, perivillous fibrin, avascular villi, and intervillous thrombosis. Cell-type and tissue-structure compositions were quantified, and slide-level deviation from a healthy reference was assessed using compositional data analysis.
resultsPlacental slides with lesions exhibited significant cellular composition differences compared with healthy controls, including increased extravillous trophoblast and leukocyte densities and decreased Hofbauer cell densities. These cellular changes were accompanied by tissue-level alterations, particularly increased fibrin deposition and changes in villous structure. Compositional deviation increased with infarction size but not with other lesion types. Notably, compositional differences were also detected in slides without an apparent lesion from placentas with lesion(s) elsewhere, indicating organ-wide responses extending beyond focal pathology.
conclusionsQuantitative deep phenotyping reveals widespread cellular and structural changes associated with placental lesions, including effects not evident on routine histological assessment. These findings demonstrate the potential of AI-based digital histology to complement conventional placental pathology in research and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42069469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.