Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42069039›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2026

Prediction of shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: external validation of an ECG-based approach.

Jeong Ho Park, Jason Coult, Dong Hyun Choi, Ki Jeong Hong, Kyoung Jun Song, Thomas D Rea, Michael Sayre, Sang Do Shin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeong Ho ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Disaster Medicine Research Center, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, the Republic of Korea. Electronic address: timthe9@snu.ac.kr.
Jason CoultDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Dong Hyun ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Disaster Medicine Research Center, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Ki Jeong HongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Disaster Medicine Research Center, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Jun SongLaboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Disaster Medicine Research Center, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, the Republic of Korea; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Thomas D ReaDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Emergency Medical Services Division, Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, United States.
Michael SayreDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States; Seattle Fire Department, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sang Do ShinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Disaster Medicine Research Center, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.

Funding

Transforming Resuscitation through Artificial INtelligence (TRAIN Study)R01HL169323 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMAS D REA · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
Artificial Intelligence to Improve Resuscitation following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestK01HL171797 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jason Coult · 2024 to 2026
$490k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL171797NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) patients can be defined as those requiring at least three defibrillation attempts. Patients with refractory VF may benefit from personalized resuscitation treatments. We sought to externally validate a previously described electrocardiogram (ECG) feature calculation and analysis strategy for predicting refractory VF in an Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cohort.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Seoul OHCA registry (2020-2023). We included patients with an initial shockable rhythm and 3-s ECG segments before and after the initial shock. Refractory VF was defined by patients requiring ≥3 total shocks (primary definition) or ≥3 consecutive shocks (alternative definition). We trained a logistic model to predict refractory VF based on 25 previously-described ECG scalogram features calculated from ECG segments before and after the first shock. Performance was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) evaluated via leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), and was compared against the original study's reported AUC.

resultsOf the 428 included OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm, 202 (47.2%) received ≥3 shocks during prehospital resuscitation. The logistic combination of 25 ECG features demonstrated good performance, with LOOCV AUCs of 0.782 [95% CI 0.736-0.828] for predicting ≥3 total shocks and 0.805 [95% CI 0.762-0.858] for ≥3 consecutive shocks. These AUCs were not significantly different versus the original study's AUC of 0.846 (P = 0.060 and P = 0.22 for respective differences).

conclusionA strategy using ECG features surrounding initial shock showed robust performance for predicting refractory VF in a distinct patient population.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationElectric CountershockElectrocardiographyOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestVentricular FibrillationAgedEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesROC CurveElectric countershockElectrocardiographyMachine learningOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID42069039
PMCPMC13218281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.