ArticleResuscitation2026
Prediction of shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: external validation of an ECG-based approach.
Article in Resuscitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) patients can be defined as those requiring at least three defibrillation attempts. Patients with refractory VF may benefit from personalized resuscitation treatments. We sought to externally validate a previously described electrocardiogram (ECG) feature calculation and analysis strategy for predicting refractory VF in an Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cohort.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Seoul OHCA registry (2020-2023). We included patients with an initial shockable rhythm and 3-s ECG segments before and after the initial shock. Refractory VF was defined by patients requiring ≥3 total shocks (primary definition) or ≥3 consecutive shocks (alternative definition). We trained a logistic model to predict refractory VF based on 25 previously-described ECG scalogram features calculated from ECG segments before and after the first shock. Performance was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) evaluated via leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), and was compared against the original study's reported AUC.
resultsOf the 428 included OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm, 202 (47.2%) received ≥3 shocks during prehospital resuscitation. The logistic combination of 25 ECG features demonstrated good performance, with LOOCV AUCs of 0.782 [95% CI 0.736-0.828] for predicting ≥3 total shocks and 0.805 [95% CI 0.762-0.858] for ≥3 consecutive shocks. These AUCs were not significantly different versus the original study's AUC of 0.846 (P = 0.060 and P = 0.22 for respective differences).
conclusionA strategy using ECG features surrounding initial shock showed robust performance for predicting refractory VF in a distinct patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.