ArticleAtencion primaria2026
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Rapid Prime Diet Quality Score Screener (rPDQS) for Spanish primary care.
Article in Atencion primaria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo translate and cross-culturally adapt the Rapid Prime Diet Quality Score Screener (rPDQS) for use in Spanish primary care.
designTranslation, cross-cultural adaptation and pilot testing. SITE: Mallorca Primary Care Centers.
participantsPrimary care professionals and healthcare university students (n=29) and patients from primary care (n=71).
interventionsAdministration of the rPDQS for cognitive debriefing and pilot testing in primary care. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Translation and cultural adaptation followed ISPOR and Beaton guidelines, including forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pretesting, and final evaluation. Pretesting comprised cognitive debriefing and pilot testing in primary care to assess comprehension, cultural relevance, feasibility, and acceptability.
resultsOnly minor linguistic and cultural refinements were required, such as refinement of cooking terms and inclusion of culturally familiar examples, without modifying the underlying constructs of the original instrument. One item relating to full-fat dairy products was identified as inconsistent with current Spanish/European dietary guidelines and was therefore removed from scoring. Examples of sweetened dairy products were added to better capture free-sugar intake. In pilot testing, the Spanish rPDQS showed good acceptability and feasibility. The mean completion time was 7min, <10% of participants required assistance, and 92% rated items as clear and culturally appropriate. Women had higher numeric scores than men, higher education and lower BMI were associated with better diet quality.
conclusionsThe Spanish version of the rPDQS shows strong linguistic, conceptual, and cultural equivalence with the original instrument and represents a feasible, clear, and culturally appropriate tool for assessing diet quality in Spanish primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.