ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Limited family ties, friendship, and contextual variation in loneliness risk across 25 countries.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating aging and health with limited family ties across societies: Challenges, adaptations, and policy responses.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Loneliness is linked to higher mortality and poorer health worldwide. As the global population of individuals who are unpartnered and childless grows, public health concerns about social isolation have risen. Sociological theories distinguish between having fewer ties, being socially isolated, and being lonely while gerontological theories emphasize how aging adults prioritize smaller, high-quality relationships. Yet, norms about family, friendship, and loneliness also differ by country contexts such as culture and development. Therefore, while close non-family ties (e.g., friendship) might reduce loneliness, particularly among those who lack partners or children, these processes likely differ across country contexts. Consequently, it remains unclear 1) whether lacking partners or children is associated with various dimensions of loneliness, 2) whether friendship buffers risk of loneliness, and 3) if and how these processes differ across societies. This study examines being unpartnered or childless, friend contact, and loneliness among those aged 45+ (N = 19,289) across 25 countries using data from the International Social Survey Programme (2017) and country-level indicators from the World Health Organization and World Values Survey. Being unpartnered is particularly associated with loneliness-especially lacking companionship. Yet, frequent friend contact likely buffers loneliness across all outcomes-especially for the unpartnered. Those in countries that place a high value on family and especially friendship are at lower risk of loneliness. These findings are discussed considering changing family structures, the potential role of friendship in compensating for limited family ties, and differential risks of loneliness by country context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.