Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42068512›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2026

Hedgehog Inhibitor and Paclitaxel: A Phase I Trial of the Oral Hedgehog inhibitor Taladegib in Combination with Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumours.

Rosalind Glasspool, Sarah Patricia Blagden, Michelle Lockley, Elaine McCartney, Carol Evans, Fiona Thomson, Jennifer Brown, Laura Spiers, Chantevy Pou, Liz-Anne Lewsley and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rosalind GlasspoolBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. ros.glasspool@nhs.scot.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5000-1680
Sarah Patricia BlagdenEarly Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-3491
Michelle LockleyCentre for Cancer Centre for Cancer Evolution, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-5789
Elaine McCartneyGlasgow Oncology Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Carol EvansGlasgow Oncology Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Fiona ThomsonThe Translational Pharmacology & Immunology Laboratory, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jennifer BrownBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Laura SpiersEarly Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Chantevy PouThe Translational Pharmacology & Immunology Laboratory, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Liz-Anne LewsleyGlasgow Oncology Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Iain A McNeishOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-7586
T R Jeffry EvansBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

The study was funded by a grant from Cancer Research UK (C8361/A18775) and an investigator-initiated grant from Lilly Oncology, later Ignyta. C8361/A18775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathway is aberrantly activated in solid tumours. Inhibition of Hh signalling by SMO inhibitors is effective in the treatment of basal cell carcinomas and medulloblastomas whereas combination treatments may be required in other solid tumours. When given with an SMO inhibitor in preclinical models, the efficacy of paclitaxel is enhanced and there is potential reversal of mechanisms of resistance to paclitaxel supporting clinical investigation of the combination. In this phase I trial, the safety and feasibility of the oral SMO inhibitor, taladegib, was evaluated in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours. This was an open-label, nonrandomised, multicentre, dose escalation trial using a standard 3 + 3 design (EudraCT: 2014-004695-37 ISRCTN15903698). Primary objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Patients received up to 6 cycles of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle). Then, 16 patients were recruited into 3 cohorts and received taladegib at 100 mg, 200 mg and 400 mg once daily, respectively. Grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was the dose-limiting toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of taladegib in combination with weekly paclitaxel was 200 mg once daily. Four patients had a partial response and 4 had confirmed stable disease at 16 weeks. The combination is feasible but cumulative neuropathy may limit longer term treatment. Hh signalling may be implicated in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHedgehog ProteinsNeoplasmsPaclitaxelAdministration, OralAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedPyridinesHedgehog ProteinsPaclitaxelPyridinesHedgehog inhibitorPaclitaxelPhase I trialTaladegib

Identifiers

PMID42068512
PMCPMC13486132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.