ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Exploring the perceived impact of stigma on the cancer experience of people with severe mental illness.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePeople with severe mental illness (SMI) experience disparities in cancer care, including delayed diagnosis, poorer symptom management, and reduced quality of life. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of individuals with SMI who have also been diagnosed with cancer.
methodsA qualitative, grounded theory study was conducted with 11 adults in England with lived experience of both SMI and cancer. Participants were recruited via NHS and voluntary organisations. Semi-structured interviews, conducted via telephone or video call, were transcribed verbatim. Coding progressed through initial, focused, and theoretical coding alongside constant comparative methods and memoing.
resultsStigma emerged as a main theme, derived through participant explanations of limited information sharing, restricted involvement in decision-making, and the misattribution of physical symptoms to mental illness. These perceived forms of stigma contributed to delays in cancer diagnosis, reduced opportunities for informed decision-making, and feelings of disempowerment. Collectively, they reinforced existing health inequities and negatively affected participants' mental and physical wellbeing throughout their cancer care and beyond.
conclusionsStructural and public stigma intersect, resulting in health-related stigma, creating barriers across cancer care pathways for people with SMI. Stigma may compromise quality care and contribute to poorer clinical and experiential outcomes in people with cancer and SMI. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Interventions are needed to reduce stigmatising behaviours and beliefs in healthcare settings, to distribute power within clinical settings, and promote shared, person-centred decision-making to ensure comprehensive information provision and recognition of patient expertise. Collectively, these actions may improve early diagnosis, cancer symptom management, recovery, and overall quality of life for cancer survivors with SMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42068491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.