ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Rethinking cytomegalovirus screening in gamete donation: a critical appraisal of practices and risks.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of gamete donation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serological screening was originally implemented to mitigate concerns about viral transmission, particularly following the HIV epidemic. Although emerging evidence questions the reliability of serological markers in accurately reflecting the presence of the virus in genital secretions, current North American practices still heavily rely on CMV serological testing to identify sperm donors at risk of transmitting CMV during fertility treatments. This review explores the complexities of CMV transmission in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), underscoring the unpredictable nature of viral shedding in semen and the inherent limitations of relying solely on serostatus for risk assessment. Additionally, the available data suggest that the risk of congenital CMV (cCMV) following ART appears low, although significant gaps in the literature highlight the need for more comprehensive studies to better evaluate transmission risks. Finally, this review advocates for the revision of CMV screening societies' guidelines, emphasizing the need for broader, evidence-based preventive strategies. Preventing CMV risk in fertility treatments may include more significant action such as patient education on simple hygiene measures to prevent infection during pregnancy-instead of current, potentially unnecessary measures such as CMV serostatus matching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.