ArticleActa parasitologica2026
Leakage-Safe ITS1 Identification of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica with Reverse-Complement-Invariant CNN Inference.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate discrimination between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica is essential for surveillance and control of fascioliasis in endemic areas. ITS1 (internal transcribed spacer 1) is a widely used molecular marker, but computational approaches to ITS-based identification must account for data quality issues in public repositories and ensure reliable decision support. PURPOSE: We developed a leakage-safe, decision-oriented pipeline for ITS1-based species identification. A curated GenBank dataset of 527 ITS1 sequences was standardized to 1,000 bp, sanitized (A/C/G/T/N only), and clustered to identify near-duplicates. Cluster-aware train/validation/test splits prevented similarity leakage. We implemented ITSformer-RC, a compact reverse-complement-invariant 1D convolutional neural network paired with a lightweight ensemble, and compared it against BLAST and k-mer logistic regression baselines. Reliability evaluation included post-hoc calibration, robustness testing under realistic perturbations (substitutions, indels, masked spans), and conformal prediction for principled abstention.
methodsWe developed a leakage-safe, decision-oriented pipeline for ITS1-based species identification. A curated GenBank dataset of 527 ITS1 sequences was standardized to 1,000 bp, sanitized (A/C/G/T/N only), and clustered to identify near-duplicates. Cluster-aware train/validation/test splits prevented similarity leakage. We implemented ITSformer-RC, a compact reverse-complement-invariant 1D convolutional neural network paired with a lightweight ensemble, and compared it against BLAST and k-mer logistic regression baselines. Reliability evaluation included post-hoc calibration, robustness testing under realistic perturbations (substitutions, indels, masked spans), and conformal prediction for principled abstention.
resultsBoth ITSformer-RC and k-mer logistic regression achieved 100% accuracy (95% Wilson CI 0.953–1.000) on the held-out cluster-aware test split (n=78), with ROC-AUC and average precision of 1.00. Forced BLAST achieved 97.4% accuracy, while strict BLAST achieved 35.9% coverage with 100% conditional accuracy among non-abstention cases. Vector/classwise temperature scaling improved probability calibration (NLL 0.00399, ECE 1.6×10⁻⁸). Under controlled perturbations, the ensemble demonstrated robust performance across substitutions (AURC 0.9981), indels (AURC 1.0000), and masked spans (AURC 0.9902). Interpretability analysis identified five localized ITS1 windows with concentrated species-discriminative signals.
conclusionThe pipeline provides a reproducible, leakage-aware framework for reliable ITS1-based Fasciola identification emphasizing decision readiness and robustness over raw accuracy alone. Both deep learning and simple statistical baselines saturate accuracy on the curated benchmark, indicating strong ITS1 separability under leakage controls. Calibrated probabilities, abstention mechanisms, and robustness characterization support practical diagnostic workflows. The results are presented as internal validation on a small public dataset; external validation across geographic regions, time periods, and laboratories is required before field deployment claims can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42068429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.