Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42068423›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2026

The Use of Statistical Shape and Appearance Modelling for Predicting Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.

Edward M Chu, Cheryl E Quenneville

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward M ChuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Cheryl E QuennevilleSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. quennev@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOsteoporotic fractures remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current clinical assessment metrics (e.g., bone mineral density) are limited in their ability to identify fracture risk and bone strength. Statistical Shape and Appearance Modelling (SSAM) offers a method to quantify anatomical geometry and density patterns. This review examines advancements in SSAM for osteoporosis research. RECENT

findingsRecent literature demonstrates that SSAM can capture detailed bone geometry and internal density distribution. Increasingly, these models are combined with computational analytics, including finite element analysis and machine learning, to assess the mechanical and structural behavior of bone. SSAM provides a robust quantitative framework for bone research. Notably, SSAM is used to reconstruct 3D subjects from clinical 2D images for biomechanical evaluation. Although clinical adoption remains limited by generalizability, the advancement of deep learning and complex SSAM pipelines supports its potential for osteoporosis screening and fracture risk prediction.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesBone DensityDeep LearningFinite Element AnalysisHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalRisk AssessmentBone imagingDeep learningFinite element analysisFracture riskOsteoporosisStatistical shape and appearance modelling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.