Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42068406›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2026

Cross-atlas Identification of Narrative Hubs via Multi-embedding Graph Models in fMRI Data.

Mohammad Amin Saket, Mansooreh Pakravan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Amin SaketDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares Univeristy, Al Ahmad Street, Tehran, 111-14115, Iran.
Mansooreh PakravanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares Univeristy, Al Ahmad Street, Tehran, 111-14115, Iran. mpakravan@modares.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main objectives of cognitive neuroscience is to investigate brain processes that underlie narrative comprehension. Furthermore, earlier studies that used naturalistic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets, like Narratives, has advanced our knowledge of large-scale language and narrative networks, most studies have relied on correlation-based analyses or single-region importance measures, overlooking the dynamic and structural properties of brain networks. In this work, we present a new graph-based framework to identify important regions in narrative comprehension by combining a composite node importance scoring method with multiple node embedding algorithms. We first used controlled simulations with stochastic block models (SBM) with different hub nodes and community strengths to validate the framework. This made it possible to systematically assess seven embedding algorithms for node influence attribution, link prediction, and community detection. Applying the same framework to fMRI data, we analyzed two parcellation schemes, the Harvard-Oxford and Schaefer (100-parcel) atlases, to identify influential cortical regions. Our findings reveal consistent engagement of the default mode, salience, and limbic networks across stories and atlases, emphasizing their central role in narrative processing. Overall, this work offers a reliable, comprehensible method for identifying key brain regions, bridging the gap between graph representation learning and cognitive neuroscience. The framework provides a scalable basis for further research that connects naturalistic cognition, dynamic brain connectivity, and linguistic features.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicBrainBrain MappingComprehensionMagnetic Resonance ImagingNarrationNerve NetAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedFMRIGraph EmbeddingHarvard-Oxford AtlasNarrative ProcessingNode ImportanceSchaefer Atlas

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.