ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Perineal Membrane Structural Changes: An Unstudied Aspect of Prolapse.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe perineal membrane (PM), perineal body, and levator ani muscles form the perineal complex, which is responsible for hiatal closure. Yet failures in its connective tissues that may lead to hiatal closure impairment are poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that pelvic organ prolapse involves PM abnormalities by comparing PM morphology between young women with prolapse and parous controls using a validated MRI-based reconstruction and analysis technique.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of MRIs from two prior studies. The PM was traced on coronal scans in 3D Slicer
resultsResting MRIs from 17 young parous women (aged < 40 years) with prolapse and 20 parous controls were compared. Women with prolapse showed 23% greater midline separation of the PM, 30% larger hiatal area, 26% larger hiatal anteroposterior diameter, 17% longer bony origin, and 26% larger PM surface area (all p ≤ 0.002, d = 1.1-1.6); swinging door angle was similar between groups (p = 0.60). Levator ani status, midline separation, and PM surface area independently predicted prolapse, explaining 76% of variance.
conclusionsThe PM structure was altered in those with prolapse through loss of central PM connection, hiatal elongation, and hiatal widening. Larger studies are needed to confirm and guide targeted repair techniques that could potentially prevent prolapse development and/or progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.